1991 Fleer – Don’t Look Directly Into The Card

In 1990, Fleer was a pretty bland set in a fresh new 90’s world.  Upper Deck continued what they started in 1989 with a continued high quality look.  Donruss and Topps on the other hand, burst onto the 90’s scene like Kelly Kapowski through a Tigers banner at a Bayside pep rally!  Donruss introduced their bright ketchup red with spots and squiggles and Topps broke out vibrant neon yellows, oranges, blues and reds.  Meanwhile, Fleer used a boring white border with team colors sprinkled throughout the set.  That’s not to say that I didn’t like the ’90 Fleer set but my positive memories of it may be more about the time period of my life and certain cards I enjoyed from the set.  Needless to say, Fleer missed an opportunity in 1990 to be flamboyant and get away with it.When 1991 rolled around, they were hell bent on not being the bland set in the group.  No, they turned it up a notch or twelve and broke out what many consider to be one of the loudest, most retinal intrusive designs in cardboard history.  And it seemed to be totally out of the blue (or yellow – waka waka).  If you go back and look through the history of Fleer, there was never any indication before or after 1991 that this design would ever be a consideration.  In movie terms, 1991 Fleer was Halloween 3.  There are a handful of events throughout history that I wish I was present for.  And I am not joking when I say that one of those events is the marketing/design meeting where this was approved.  I have to know if it was a resounding yes or if it won by a single vote or if they just decided to flip a coin and go with a random option.Nevertheless, this was the option chosen and this is the set we were given when Saved By The Bell, Full House and Fresh Prince were giving us all the loud colors and designs we could stand on television.  For 1991, I don’t suppose this set was all that out of place.  Although, Topps had gone back to its more classic white border and Donruss toned it down quite a bit with their new blue border, the opportunity Fleer missed in 1990 was more than made up for in 1991.  A set that will forever be marred by that taxi cab/mustard/Big Bird yellow border in what otherwise would have been a fairly promising set.The set itself is made up of 720 cards, as was the norm for the 80’s and early 90’s sets.  That sounds like sooo many cards now.  The insert sets that year included All-Stars, Team Logo Stickers, World Series cards, box bottoms and my personal favorite, Pro-Visions.  To this day, the Pro-Visions remain one of my favorite inserts of all time.  According to www.tradingcarddb.com, there are also 55 errors or variations.  Though many were uncorrected, it does still allow for somewhat of a chase so many years later.  The wax box came with 36 packs of 14 cards and 1 logo sticker.  Fleer’s box advertised “Full Color Backs”, “2 Player Pictures Per Card” and “Improved Action Shots” which while all factual was very much debatable as well.Base Cards – The checklist does have some strong names that include Nolan Ryan, Ken Griffey Jr., Wade Boggs, Kirby Puckett, Don Mattingly and of course, Ron Gant.  But the checklist is loaded with guys I don’t even remember; Jim Vatcher, Kelvin Torve and Troy Afenir??  720 cards was way too large of a checklist for Major League Baseball in 1991.  I can’t put a positive spin on this, not even with Ronnie Gant in there.  I did choose the Tom Gordon for a reason though.  A friend of mine who played softball with me for many years was in the Royals farm system with Gordon.  He played right field and says that Gordon would turn and look at him almost every time the ball was going to be hit to him.  That’s how good Gordon was in the minors.  He could almost predict where the hitters were going with the pitch he was about to throw.  I thought that was amazing but it’s probably fairly common with major leaguers.Rookie Cards – As was normal with Fleer, they didn’t have any unique designation for a rookie card in the set.  The rookie cards looked just like the veterans.  No Future Star, Rated Rookie, All Star Rookie or even just “Rookie”.  The rookie checklist may be one of the worst I’ve ever seen.  The best rookie in the entire set was Luis Gonzalez and he won by a landslide over such names as Carlos Garcia, Randy Tomlin, Terry Lee, Jeff Gray and Tom Edens.  I didn’t just go through and pick bad names for effect either.  Take a look at the rookie checklist when you have time.  It’s truly abysmal.  One name though that brought back memories was Phil Plantier.  He was Kevin Maas-light in 1991.Inserts – Not much in the way of inserts besides the Pro-Visions which we’ll discuss in a moment.  The main cards in the set that differed from the base cards were “Leader” cards.  These included Home Run leaders, Saves leaders, etc.  There is also a card made just like the leader cards called “Second Generation Stars” that pictures Ken Griffey Jr. and Barry Bonds.  I’ll take what I can get at this point.Pro-Vision – Alas, the main reason I wanted to revisit this set.  I pulled three of the Pro-Visions in the 32 packs I opened.  There are 4 packs that are left over that are going to be randomed to a VERY lucky winner!  The Pro-Visions I pulled were Jose Canseco, Ruben Sierra and Don Mattingly, all players I liked in 91.  Canseco is holding a bat that is being struck by lightning under a cloudy night sky.  Ruben is wearing his Sheriff badge and standing in the desert.  Finally, Mattingly is holding 3 bats and standing in front of a full pinstripe backdrop.  These cards were so cool to me.  They are truly the only thing that saved this set from the lowest possible Dub Score.

MiscellaneousSeriously, what is Jeff Treadway doing here?How about mixing up the font mid sentence on the back of the card?I’m guessing this is one of the few times Tony Gwynn got caught looking?Here is Steve Avery on a high school baseball field in front of a crowd of zero!I really want to know what Fleer considers a “Card Accounting System”.And if you needed any more reasons to dislike this set, how about a Jack Clark?

I think you know where I am going with this score.  I can’t give it a 1 simply because of the Pro-Vision cards.  I can’t have a set with one of my favorite inserts be a 1.  I can have it be a 2 though.  The set is honestly worse than I remember and is only held together with nostalgia and Pro-Visions.  The card stock is bad, the photos are bad, the lighting is bad, the checklist is bad and the rookie crop is bad.  I’m really not trying to be too harsh but I really can’t find much to like about this set of than one insert set.  My advice is to look elsewhere when wanting to travel down memory lane in 1991.

Dub Score – 2

Scoring Scale

1. Let me be the sacrificial lamb so you don’t have to buy these cards.  Just read the post and thank me later.

2. There is worse but there is much better – not worth the effort though.

3. Middle of the road – I wouldn’t talk you into buying these but I certainly wouldn’t talk you out of them.

4. You should probably go out and buy a box and enjoy the rip – I did!  It has some downside but worth the ride.

5. Stop reading and find a box to buy and get to Breaking!  What are you waiting on?