What’s In The Fireproof?  Part 1

My cousin had a house fire when he was a youngster.  The house was destroyed along with all of his youthful possessions.  Among those possessions was his baseball card collection.  He lost a nice vintage Harmon Killebrew in that fire.  Though not the most important issue he had at the time, I’ve always wondered what I’d do if I lost my cards to a fire or flood or some other act of God.  I have a ton of years in this hobby and I have a ton of cards that are worth next to nothing on the open market but are invaluable to me.  There’s no way I can protect all of my cards but I do try and look after some of them.

I have a small fireproof box where I keep my favorite cards.  My hope is that the box would survive a tornado or fire and I’d have my cards.  Kinda sad when I put it in those terms.  They aren’t even my most expensive cards as much as they’re just special.  I have baseball, basketball, football and two autographed baseballs in this magical case.  I also have my newly purchased Cuyler Smith cards in there.  The selection may change from time to time but about 80% of the cards in there will always be in there.  These cards are the PC items that I’d never let go of and hopefully my daughter feels the same about them because they’ll be hers one day.  All of these cards have some sort of story; either the card itself or the player featured.  Let’s take a gander at a few.2012/13 Exquisite Endorsements Michael Jordan/Larry Bird Dual Autograph #d 14/15 – This is one of my prize pieces, top 5 no doubt.  As a child of the 80’s and a teen of the 90’s, it didn’t get better than Bird and Jordan, unless you threw Magic in there too.  I don’t care what today’s fans say about LeBron, he’s not Jordan.  He’s unbelievably talented but there will never be another Jordan.  And Bird was one of the best sharpshooters in basketball history.  Plus, he played defense, rebounded, dove for loose balls and fought for teammates.  Jordan and Bird are the reasons I played basketball in high school.  I wanted to be these guys, just like every other 13 year old that played basketball.  Two legends, on the same card, autographed.  This one stays in the fireproof until I’m dead and gone!2015 Leaf Buyback Bo Jackson Auto #12/40 – Another 80’s legend!  I’m a southern boy and a UGA fan.  But, I can appreciate otherworldly talent when I see it, even if it comes from Auburn.  We did have Herschel though!  But Bo was a beast in baseball and football.  There are so many cool stories I’ve heard about Bo when he was at Auburn.  Bo was so easy to pull for.  He was a terrific athlete and had a great charisma in front of the camera.  Not only did I love Bo Jackson, I also loved 1990 Leaf so when I saw this card, I had to have it.  It’s the only Bo auto I have and it’s another that will never see the outside of the fireproof unless I’m holding it.Panini HOF 75th Anniversary Satchel Paige Emerald #6/10 – I looked at these boxes for months on www.dacardworld.com before I finally pulled the trigger.  I pulled a few nice autos in the box but my favorite card was this Satchel Paige with the Emerald.  I don’t own any Satchel Paige original cards so this is the best I can do.  Paige is in 3 separate Hall of Fames and is remembered by some as possibly the best pitcher ever.  Being numbered to 10 and having a gem in the card makes it a very nice keepsake for me!1989 Upper Deck TTM Nolan Ryan Auto – This is a recent addition to the fireproof.  I sent this off to the Nolan Ryan Foundation back in November and got it back in early February.  The ’89 Upper Deck was my favorite Nolan (that I wanted to mail) but I was a little concerned at how dark the photo was when I mailed it.  I was pleasantly surprised when it came back and he used a nice blue ink for the auto.  It came out great and is the only Ryan auto I have.  There isn’t much I can say about Nolan Ryan that you don’t already know.  You don’t read my blog for me to tell you that Ryan was a good pitcher.  But he was a man’s man and personified the force on the mound that you wanted to be as a pitcher.  I remember during 8th grade, I spent the summer reading his book and following his arm workouts in hopes of picking up some velocity on my fastball.  It definitely helped but I wasn’t really throwing that much harder.  It was cool doing it though.  And who can forget what he did to poor Robin Ventura when he charged the mound that fateful night?  A Ryan Express auto was a huge get for me!!1992 Donruss Elite Ken Griffey Jr PSA 8 – I didn’t buy this card because of the grade.  I bought it to own it, plain and simple.  When Donruss Elite hit the scene, I can remember me and my friends losing our minds trying to pull one of those.  Twenty-five years later and I still have never pulled one.  I did pull a Robin Yount Legend Series card a couple years ago that was very similar to the Elite but no such luck with the original chase card.  I remember one of my best friends pulling an André Dawson.  I’m not being dramatic when I say that it was the equivalent of pulling a Mike Trout auto today for us.  We went nuts!  And then, the jealousy set in.  I wanted one!!  So, when I grew up and started earning an income, I bought one.  It’s not the same as pulling one but I have a Ken Griffey Jr Elite Series and that’s all that matters to me!Nick Chubb Leaf Army AA Patch Auto#20/25 – This one is going to be a bit regional for some but trust me, you’ll be seeing Nick Chubb on Sunday’s very soon.  Nick Chubb is the kind of kid that every fan appreciates and pulls for.  This is a kid who dominates on the field and is a rock star on campus but skips spring break to work out at his old high school.  Instead of partying on the beach, he’s running sprints in Athens alone.  He is humble, speaks highly of his teammates and never blames anyone for a loss.  Plus he’s an absolute stud with a football in his hands.  He’s #2 on the all time rushing list at UGA and isn’t mathematically eliminated from passing the greatest ever, Herschel Walker. You may not like UGA, but it’s hard not to like Nick Chubb!  We love him and he’s a Damn Good Dawg (DGD).2015 Panini Contenders Todd Gurley Auto – Speaking of DGD’s, there’s Herschel Walker and then there’s Todd Gurley and Nick Chubb.  Chubb passed Gurley on the rushing list this past year but Gurley missed quite a bit of collegiate time with a couple of knee injuries.  He could rush for 100, catch 5 for 100 and return a kickoff 100 in the same game.  He was as smooth a runner as I’ve ever seen in person.  Chubb and Herschel run you over, just ask Bill Bates. But Gurley can run you over or run around you and take it to the house.  But more than that, Gurley made a great impression on me and my family when we met him before the draft in 2015.  We went to a meet and greet where we were able to take pictures with him and then we got in line for autographs.  The downfall of getting the picture and auto ticket was that we had to go to the back of the line after the picture as the auto line was filling at the same time.  The auto line took hours.  We even had a chance to grab a bite to eat at the Dave and Busters while we waited.  Even after that loooong wait, when we got up to Gurley for the auto, he remembered my 9 year old daughters name!  He posed for another picture, even though he wasn’t supposed to.  One of the most soft spoken and humble superstars I’ve ever met.  I love Herschel!  I love Nick Chubb!  And I love Todd Gurley!  Please don’t ever ask me to rank them in order because I don’t know if I can.So there are the first 7 items from the fireproof.  There are more where those came from.  I’ll come back for a part 2 when the time is right and I’ll pick 6-7 more to share.  Thanks to @camp2x for the inspiration on this one.  Do you have items locked away that you’ll never consider getting rid of?  I’m sure we all have players and cards that are near and dear to us.  These are mine and I’m doing the best I can to keep them safe!

J-Dub

New Product Review – 2017 Gypsy Queen

When it comes to baseball cards, I generally stick to full boxes of my tried and true “Junk Wax”.  I usually buy lots of packs for modern stuff but rarely pick up a box.  I decided to step out and buy a box of Gypsy Queen today when I went by the LCS.  I went by just to pick up a few packs to see what they were like, assuming that they hadn’t changed much.  It has been a fairly stagnant design for me over the last few years.  I like them, don’t get me wrong, but they’ve never been very “colorful” and that’s Topp’s intent I believe.  They tend to get lost in a vortex of Gypsy Queen and Allen & Ginter for me each year.  They are a very nice classic looking card but I’ve never been blown away.When I showed up at the LCS today, the first thing I noticed was a change in the packaging.  The box had a more colorful design and featured a couple of Cubbies (Bryant and Schwarber).  There is also a new banner that is being used that has a vibrant tint of green that sets off the look.  I know, this is probably nerdy, but the appearance of the box has led me to buy or avoid in the past.  The previous year’s boxes just had a dull feel to me but this one really got my attention.  I then saw that box toppers had taken the place of the mini box that was previously a standard.  I never really got excited about the mini’s.Then I saw that they had opened a couple of packs so I was able to preview the cards.  I was impressed.  I had previously picked up six packs to buy and explore.  After seeing the box and the cards that had been opened, I put the six packs up and opted for the box.  The product really got my attention.  The box continues to offer 8 cards per pack, 24 packs and 2 on card autographs per box.  The on card autograph is always a plus for me with GQ.  The set checklist is 300 base cards with 20 additional base short prints of legends of the game.  Another habit I have when buying a new box is to slowly break it over a few days to make it last.  I decided this time that I was just going to rip this box and see what happened.  I did save the box topper for last though.Base CardThe base card, like the box, has a new inclusion of various green tints in the Gypsy Queen logo, giving it a fresh new look.  The backs of the cards are similar to previous years with no stats and only text about an accomplishment or strength.  I had to show Buster Posey some love because he is the hometown boy here in Leesburg.Young SuperstarsAs you can see, the set is loaded with the biggest young names in the game.  I pulled a solid collection of young stars.RookiesLike years past, the rookies are identified with the small RC in the bottom corner of the card.  A nice Benintendi RC was hidden in this box.LegendsThese cards are numbered 301-320.  I pulled the Sultan of Swat, Babe Ruth, and a sweet Jackie Robinson.  I still desperately want a vintage Jackie Robinson if any of my readers have one lying around collecting dust.Missing BlackplateThese cards are lighter than the base cards, due to removal of the blackplate in the print.  I pulled four of these in the box.  They are found at a ratio of 1:9 so I had pretty good luck with four.  The players included Zack Grienke, Starlin Castro, Melky Cabrera and the previously mentioned Jackie RobinsonMissing NameplateThese are found1:21 packs and are variations of the base version of the player with the name on the front of the card missing.  In my case, I pull a Jake Arrieta.  The card has an interesting look without the nameplate.Black and White ParallelThese are serial numbered on the back to 50.  This Wilson Ramos was numbered 22/50.Purple ParallelThese are serial numbered on the back to 250.  Trevor Story was numbered 82/250 and Joe Mauer was numbered 189/250.Fortune TellerThis insert is a mini (but larger than the usual mini) that reads like a fortune on the back.  For example, Yoan Moncada reads, “The 22 year-old Yoan will open 2017 by making his Triple-A debut, then impress in later action with the White Sox and be an AL Rookie of the Year candidate in ’17.”  The card is about 2/3 the width but is the same height of a standard card.  I also pulled a Fortune Teller of Aaron Judge, Adrian Beltre and Adrian Gonzalez.Hand Drawn Art CardsMost people know my weakness at this point is an artist sketch or a hand drawn card.  These are reproductions of a hand sketch of a player in the set.  I pulled Bryce Harper, Anthony Rizzo and Cole Hamels and when I first saw them, they took me back to 1991 Score!  These are early favorites for insert of the year!  I know, a little premature.AutographsThe first autograph was Luis Severino.  I pulled his ’87 Topps version over the weekend so maybe the baseball card spirits are giving me some sort of hint on a new PC.  The second autograph was that of Blake Snell, a Tampa Bay Rays young arm.Box TopperI saved this one for last because I love box toppers.  The box toppers are called “GQ Glassworks” and are a thick chrome card.  Mine was Carlos Correa and was a beautiful card!

Additional inserts and parallels that are present in the set that I did not pull include: Capless (players without their hats) found 1:158, Throwback Uniforms found 1:420 and Gum Ad Backs found 1:629.  All of these can come with missing blackplates and in black parallels.  Black parallels are 1:1 in the set.  Check out www.cardboardconnection.com for more information on the parallels and variations.

I had a really good time with this box.  Part of it is because it’s a brand new product and I hadn’t seen any of the inserts yet.  There is always added intrigue when you’re seeing a product for the first time.  I also love the hand drawn inserts and on card autographs.  The addition of a box topper this year in place of the mini’s is a big positive move for me.  I would have to say that this is the best GQ design I have seen thus far as well.  Overall, I plan to buy more of this product and potentially try and put the set together with parallels and variations.  It has potential to be a fun and challenging one!  I have to give it a 5 on the Dub-O-Meter.  I recommend this product for anyone who enjoys GQ, A&G or any other classically designed card.

Dub Score – 5

Scoring Scale

1. Let me be the sacrificial lamb so you don’t have to buy these cards.  Just read the post and thank me later.

2. There is worse but there is much better – not worth the effort though.

3. Middle of the road – I wouldn’t talk you into buying these but I certainly wouldn’t talk you out of them.

4. You should probably go out and buy a box and enjoy the rip – I did!  It has some downside but worth the ride.

5. Stop reading and find a box to buy and get to Breaking!  What are you waiting on?

1988 Revco Baseball – The Cure For What Ails You!

Revco was a pharmacy that originated in Detroit MI in 1956. They were found through out the Ohio Valley, Mid-Atlantic and Southeastern United Sates. In 1986, Revco was the largest drugstore chain in the United States with 2,049 stores in 30 states. I always wondered where the name Revco came from but found out in my research that it was originally Registered Vitamin Company. There was a Revco located about 30 miles from our house so we didn’t go often but I was very familiar with the store. We had a Big B Drugs in my hometown, along with Rite Aid and some local shops. Revco shuttered its doors in 1997.In 1988, Revco joined other retailers such as Rite Aid, Kmart, Woolworth’s and others by teaming up with Topps to create a baseball card set for their store. Revco decided to go with a League Leaders theme and included some very different names for an oddball set at that time. We’ve discussed some of the mainstays in those sets from Wade Boggs, Don Mattingly, Kirby Puckett, Tim Raines and Tony Gwynn. The names we haven’t mentioned though are Kent Tekulve, Juan Samuel, Brian Downing and Mark Eichhorn. I can’t wait to see what they led the league in.As for the set, it was pretty standard for Topps to go with a 33 card set for the oddballs while Fleer went with 44. This set included 18 hitters and 15 pitchers, a much more even breakdown than some others I’ve opened recently. The cards had the same high gloss that KayBee and Kmart sets had and were on reasonably sturdy card stock. The design was a bit funky with the Revco logo taking up 2/3rd of the top border and the Topps League Leaders logo was in bright yellow in the top right. The bright yellow immediately gave me flashbacks to ’91 Fleer a couple of nights ago. The bottom right of the card has a diagonal name banner that includes the team name and the position. Again, there is that yellow! The backs of the cards used two shades of red (pink) and again show the Topps and Revco logos. Only one year of stats (1987) is included along with the career line. The text box center-right of the card provides the league leading stat category for the player.Let’s take a look at a few of the cards and the stats that led the league in 1987.Would you be surprised if I told you that Tony Gwynn led the National League in batting average? He hit a solid .370 in 1987 and also led the league with 218 hits. By 1988, this was his 3rd season leading the league in hits and 2nd season leading in average.In the American League, Wade Boggs led the way with a .363 batting average. He finished with an even 200 hits, his 5th consecutive season of such a feat. He would also do it again in 1988 and 1989.Two players split the AL lead for hits. Kirby Puckett and Kevin Seitzer led the way with 207 hits. Puckett is a Hall of Famer but Seitzer was always a bit underrated to me. He didn’t have a lot of pop (13 was his season high in home runs) but he did hit .295 over a 12 year career and did not strike out much at all.Vince Coleman led the majors in stolen bases with 109. This actually still stands as the 10th best stolen base season in major league history but it’s not even Coleman’s best, as he had 110 in 1985. Rickey Henderson had 93 in ’88 but no one has even come close since then with the best being Marquis Grissom with 78 in 1992.Andre Dawson was the king masher in the NL with 49 home runs. This was a career high for the Hawk, who would finish with 438 home runs over 21 years. He also led the majors with 137 RBI that year, another career high.In the AL, Mark McGwire burst onto the scene as a home run king with 49 home runs as well. Everyone knows that this was not his career high as he would best that 4 times with seasons of 52, 58, 65 and 70. The amazing thing about 1987 was that it was his first full season. He finished with 49 bombs, 118 RBI and a .289 average.George “Taco” Bell led the AL in RBI with 134, 3 off the Hawk’s pace. This was Bell’s career high but he did have 4 seasons (12 total) with 100+ RBI. He finished with 47 home runs, just 2 behind McGwire.Nolan Ryan led the NL with 270 K’s and a 2.76 ERA. I have found that he is not always included in these oddball sets so this was a pleasant surprise. He’s in the Astro’s uniform as well, which is a plus. The amazing stat for Ryan that year was that even after leading the league in K’s and ERA, he would finish with an 8-16 record, the worst win/loss ratio of his career.. Man, the Astros were bad!In the AL, Roger Clemens set the pace with 18 complete games and 7 shutouts. Those numbers are astronomical by today’s standards. I was just having this conversation with Ryan (@basecardhero) on Twitter over the weekend. The MLB leader in complete games in 2016 was Chris Sale (6) so Clemens threw more shutouts than the CG leader in today’s game. I know that the game has changed but complete games are really a forgotten stat. Clemens got a ton more run support than Ryan. His ERA was higher at 2.97 and he finished with a 20-9 record, which also led the AL.And of course, Jack Clark would lead the league in Slugging. Curse him and his deceiving stat line! He had a .597 slugging percentage but also led the league with 136 BB’s. I have nothing else to add here.As for the otherwise random oddball inclusions, Kent “Science Teacher” Tekulve led the league in games pitched. I was curious as to why he was included but this makes sense. He didn’t lead in wins or K’s but he did pitch in the most games so there’s that. Mark Eichhorn led the AL with 89 games pitched.Juan Samuel led the NL in triples with 15. Not a huge season for triples as this was good for 414th all time.Finally, Brian Downing led the AL in BB’s with 106, 30 off the pace of Jack Clark in the NL. This was also his best home run season with 29. Downing had consistent power with 5 consecutive 20+ home run seasons from 1984-1989.

This was a really cool little set that included some players that normally didn’t get the honor of being in a 33 card set. Of course, the argument can be made that the checklist isn’t as strong as others but if you are including all of the leagues leaders, it is pretty representative of that moment in time. The design was classic 80’s and the cards were in good condition. The cost of the set is below $5, so its a very easy add to the PC if oddball’s are your preference. I’ll give this one a solid 4 on the Dub-O-Meter and recommend that you take a look if you’re in the market. Revco may have gone out of business but they did put a good oddball set on the market before they did.

Dub Score – 4

Scoring Scale

1. Let me be the sacrificial lamb so you don’t have to buy these cards.  Just read the post and thank me later.

2. There is worse but there is much better – not worth the effort though.

3. Middle of the road – I wouldn’t talk you into buying these but I certainly wouldn’t talk you out of them.

4. You should probably go out and buy a box and enjoy the rip – I did!  It has some downside but worth the ride.

5. Stop reading and find a box to buy and get to Breaking!  What are you waiting on?

 

Mail Day from Shane Katz

I received a fine mail day from Shane Katz (@shanekatz73 on twitter) and I have to share these additions to the PC.  Shane also has a blog that’s found at www.otwbbcards.wordpress.com  Shane is a Boston guy and collects Red Sox if you have any to deal.  He’s a great trade partner and responsible shipper.  Check him out!  My mail day was heavy on the Ron Gant cards, which is really the best kind of mail day.  Shane also tossed in some extras that are really cool that are worth sharing.  Shane sent 13 Gant’s and I needed 12 of them.  I am thin on Gant in the late 90’s-early 2000’s and that’s where he came through.  The stretch I received covered Gant in 6 uniforms.  I did not have any from his Rockies season so that was a nice addition.  I won’t discuss all of them but here are a few highlights.Of course, one for nostalgia was the 1989 Topps Glossy Rookies card #9.  Ronnie looks like they caught him right after BP.Then, representing the Reds, we have the 1996 Topps card #70.  He only played one full season with the Reds as he spent 1994 on the disabled list.  In ‘95, he hit .276 with 29 home runs and 23 stolen bases, good enough for his second National League Comeback Player of the Year award.  He looks a lot like Reggie Sanders in this picture.Next, he appeared twice in the 1999 Topps set.  Once in the base set in his St. Louis uniform and then in the traded set after his move to Philadelphia.  In St. Louis, he played 3 seasons with 73 total home runs and 35 stolen bases.  He endured a very tough stretch in batting average never topping .246 in that as a Cardinal.  He also had a career high 162 strikeouts in 1997.  In Philly, he rebounded a bit in the average department but the home runs dipped to 20 and 17.  Stolen bases had also reached a career low with 5 in ’99 and 1 in 2000.The next stop was Colorado for a partial season in 2001 as shown on the 2001 Topps here.  A forgettable stop in Colorado with a .257 average and 8 homeruns.  He would finish the season in Oakland, playing 34 games and compiling a .420 average and 2 home runs.Ronnie’s final full season in the majors was with San Diego in 2002.  The 2003 Topps would be his final of the set as an active player.  He would go on to appear in Archives and other products as a retired player.The last two cards are from the 2014 Topps Archives set and are a couple of my favorites.  The first is the ’69 Deckle Mini with the facsimile autograph.  There is a ’69 Deckle in the set with a true autograph and I have tried to snipe it from time to time on eBay.  The second card is the 1987 Topps Future Star and is hands down my favorite Gant.  First you have the 1987 Topps design and then you have the sweet Future Star logo that I have raved about in several blog posts.  You really can’t beat a card like this and it was the best card in the mail day!  Also, both in Braves uniforms.The extras included this sweet 1984 Ralston Purina Dan Quisenberry.  I have been eyeing this set for a future oddball set post.Next up are four awesome 1980-1981 Topps Basketball cards from Shane’s youth.  He even made sure they were all Atlanta Hawks.  I do not own enough early 80’s basketball.More oddballs with Steve Garvey and Don Mattingly from the 1987 Fleer Exciting Stars set.  Mattingly was exciting but Garvey was pretty bland for a set title like that.The final piece of the mail day was another oddball with the 1986 KayBee Young Superstars of Baseball, Alvin Davis. 

All of these cards are right up my alley and made for a very exciting early week mail day.  I need to get to work on another trade with Shane because he provides some sweet returns.  I will no doubt have to step up my game on the next mailing though.  Thanks Shane!

J-Dub

1991 Fleer – Don’t Look Directly Into The Card

In 1990, Fleer was a pretty bland set in a fresh new 90’s world.  Upper Deck continued what they started in 1989 with a continued high quality look.  Donruss and Topps on the other hand, burst onto the 90’s scene like Kelly Kapowski through a Tigers banner at a Bayside pep rally!  Donruss introduced their bright ketchup red with spots and squiggles and Topps broke out vibrant neon yellows, oranges, blues and reds.  Meanwhile, Fleer used a boring white border with team colors sprinkled throughout the set.  That’s not to say that I didn’t like the ’90 Fleer set but my positive memories of it may be more about the time period of my life and certain cards I enjoyed from the set.  Needless to say, Fleer missed an opportunity in 1990 to be flamboyant and get away with it.When 1991 rolled around, they were hell bent on not being the bland set in the group.  No, they turned it up a notch or twelve and broke out what many consider to be one of the loudest, most retinal intrusive designs in cardboard history.  And it seemed to be totally out of the blue (or yellow – waka waka).  If you go back and look through the history of Fleer, there was never any indication before or after 1991 that this design would ever be a consideration.  In movie terms, 1991 Fleer was Halloween 3.  There are a handful of events throughout history that I wish I was present for.  And I am not joking when I say that one of those events is the marketing/design meeting where this was approved.  I have to know if it was a resounding yes or if it won by a single vote or if they just decided to flip a coin and go with a random option.Nevertheless, this was the option chosen and this is the set we were given when Saved By The Bell, Full House and Fresh Prince were giving us all the loud colors and designs we could stand on television.  For 1991, I don’t suppose this set was all that out of place.  Although, Topps had gone back to its more classic white border and Donruss toned it down quite a bit with their new blue border, the opportunity Fleer missed in 1990 was more than made up for in 1991.  A set that will forever be marred by that taxi cab/mustard/Big Bird yellow border in what otherwise would have been a fairly promising set.The set itself is made up of 720 cards, as was the norm for the 80’s and early 90’s sets.  That sounds like sooo many cards now.  The insert sets that year included All-Stars, Team Logo Stickers, World Series cards, box bottoms and my personal favorite, Pro-Visions.  To this day, the Pro-Visions remain one of my favorite inserts of all time.  According to www.tradingcarddb.com, there are also 55 errors or variations.  Though many were uncorrected, it does still allow for somewhat of a chase so many years later.  The wax box came with 36 packs of 14 cards and 1 logo sticker.  Fleer’s box advertised “Full Color Backs”, “2 Player Pictures Per Card” and “Improved Action Shots” which while all factual was very much debatable as well.Base CardsThe checklist does have some strong names that include Nolan Ryan, Ken Griffey Jr., Wade Boggs, Kirby Puckett, Don Mattingly and of course, Ron Gant.  But the checklist is loaded with guys I don’t even remember; Jim Vatcher, Kelvin Torve and Troy Afenir??  720 cards was way too large of a checklist for Major League Baseball in 1991.  I can’t put a positive spin on this, not even with Ronnie Gant in there.  I did choose the Tom Gordon for a reason though.  A friend of mine who played softball with me for many years was in the Royals farm system with Gordon.  He played right field and says that Gordon would turn and look at him almost every time the ball was going to be hit to him.  That’s how good Gordon was in the minors.  He could almost predict where the hitters were going with the pitch he was about to throw.  I thought that was amazing but it’s probably fairly common with major leaguers.Rookie Cards – As was normal with Fleer, they didn’t have any unique designation for a rookie card in the set.  The rookie cards looked just like the veterans.  No Future Star, Rated Rookie, All Star Rookie or even just “Rookie”.  The rookie checklist may be one of the worst I’ve ever seen.  The best rookie in the entire set was Luis Gonzalez and he won by a landslide over such names as Carlos Garcia, Randy Tomlin, Terry Lee, Jeff Gray and Tom Edens.  I didn’t just go through and pick bad names for effect either.  Take a look at the rookie checklist when you have time.  It’s truly abysmal.  One name though that brought back memories was Phil Plantier.  He was Kevin Maas-light in 1991.InsertsNot much in the way of inserts besides the Pro-Visions which we’ll discuss in a moment.  The main cards in the set that differed from the base cards were “Leader” cards.  These included Home Run leaders, Saves leaders, etc.  There is also a card made just like the leader cards called “Second Generation Stars” that pictures Ken Griffey Jr. and Barry Bonds.  I’ll take what I can get at this point.Pro-VisionAlas, the main reason I wanted to revisit this set.  I pulled three of the Pro-Visions in the 32 packs I opened.  There are 4 packs that are left over that are going to be randomed to a VERY lucky winner!  The Pro-Visions I pulled were Jose Canseco, Ruben Sierra and Don Mattingly, all players I liked in 91.  Canseco is holding a bat that is being struck by lightning under a cloudy night sky.  Ruben is wearing his Sheriff badge and standing in the desert.  Finally, Mattingly is holding 3 bats and standing in front of a full pinstripe backdrop.  These cards were so cool to me.  They are truly the only thing that saved this set from the lowest possible Dub Score.

MiscellaneousSeriously, what is Jeff Treadway doing here?How about mixing up the font mid sentence on the back of the card?I’m guessing this is one of the few times Tony Gwynn got caught looking?Here is Steve Avery on a high school baseball field in front of a crowd of zero!I really want to know what Fleer considers a “Card Accounting System”.And if you needed any more reasons to dislike this set, how about a Jack Clark?

I think you know where I am going with this score.  I can’t give it a 1 simply because of the Pro-Vision cards.  I can’t have a set with one of my favorite inserts be a 1.  I can have it be a 2 though.  The set is honestly worse than I remember and is only held together with nostalgia and Pro-Visions.  The card stock is bad, the photos are bad, the lighting is bad, the checklist is bad and the rookie crop is bad.  I’m really not trying to be too harsh but I really can’t find much to like about this set of than one insert set.  My advice is to look elsewhere when wanting to travel down memory lane in 1991.

Dub Score – 2

Scoring Scale

1. Let me be the sacrificial lamb so you don’t have to buy these cards.  Just read the post and thank me later.

2. There is worse but there is much better – not worth the effort though.

3. Middle of the road – I wouldn’t talk you into buying these but I certainly wouldn’t talk you out of them.

4. You should probably go out and buy a box and enjoy the rip – I did!  It has some downside but worth the ride.

5. Stop reading and find a box to buy and get to Breaking!  What are you waiting on?

Pet Peeves – Collector’s Edition

You may have skimmed through my previous pet peeves post and understand where I’m going with this one.  For those who haven’t, I’ll lay out some basics up front.  As with my previous pet peeve post, I’m not calling anyone individually out, although I do point a finger at some companies.  These are things that rub me the wrong way in my daily walk through collecting.  Some of it is part deception on seller’s parts, some is manufacturer greed and some is just nonsense in general.  I imagine that as you go through this list, you’ll be nodding your head in agreement because you’ve likely dealt with these issues yourself.  You may even have your own story about one of these.  This is meant in fun and hopefully you’ll get a good chuckle out of it.eBay 1/1 – This one is pretty widely booed amongst my acquaintances.  When somebody posts an eBay 1/1, I look in my collection, praying that I find what they’re selling so I can list it and it won’t be 1/1 anymore.  I could put my personalized Joey Shiver ’87 Topps up on eBay and call it a 1/1 but it’s not bringing any more cash.  Maybe you’ll find a sucker out there that doesn’t understand what you’re trying to do, but it’s not going to be me.  I went to my LCS this morning and I saw a ton of “LCS 1/1’s.”  Maybe they should start putting that on their stickers!  Listen, it’s either a 1/1 or it isn’t.  It’s not eBay 1/1, Twitter 1/1 or Facebook 1/1.  Just stop it!Advertisement of “Gem Mint Condition” – This is another eBay style gimmick that gets me riled.  You may be selling a card in very good condition but don’t tell me it’s Gem Mint unless it’s graded.  And please don’t say it like this, “Gem Mint???”  I don’t know, you’re the one selling it and you’re asking me?  How about we just be honest with each other and say, “Hey, as far as I can tell, this card is in very good condition.  No visible blemishes, corners and surface looks good, centering is nice.”  The Fatpacks just talked about the difficulty of grading on their last podcast.  Please don’t try to sell me a Gem Mint Condition, eBay 1/1 with your 98.2% seller rating.  I’m not buying it based on that description, I’m buying it because I want the card.  I’m probably not buying it at all with that rating.Hits stated as Autos OR Memorabilia – Here’s one that’s on the company.  New products always state their odds of hits in the box.  2 autos/1 mem per box – 1 auto/2 mems per box.  You get it.  But when they state 3 autos or mems per box, I know I’m getting 1 auto and 2 mems.  If it says 1 auto or mem, I’m getting a mem.  Maybe it’s just my luck but I’ve never pulled 3 autos out of a box that said OR.  And don’t even get me started on Allen & Ginter!  I really like the product but in that one you get 3 hits but they could be – Autographs, Relics, Originals, Book Cards, Cut Signatures, Rip Cards or Ancient Rome Relics featuring real Roman coins.  You get all that?  I bought 4 boxes last year and I shite you not, I got 1 auto and 11 relics.  Just tell me what’s in the box and let’s move on!  If I pull an auto, great.  But don’t feed me these false hopes.Pack Searchers – We’re all familiar.  You get hobby at a card shop or online and you get retail at Target or Wal Mart.  Hobby is always better because they have more hits and good shop owners don’t let their customers search.  But this pack searching is the lowest of the low and if these were in any type of order, this would be peeve numero uno.  There are YouTube videos dedicated to outing these scumbags.  What makes them even worse is when they act like they’re doing nothing wrong.  Card companies have done a lot to try and combat it with their packaging but there are real dedicated toolbags out there that find a way.  They feel all of the packs in Wal Mart, bringing in scales and tiny magnets, all in hopes of finding that one pack that is a little different than the others.  I’m fine if you can eyeball a pack and see a difference but when you bring in your searching kit, you can get bent.  Next time you go to Target, look at an open box of cards and you’ll see that the entire inventory has been rifled through.  That’s the universal mating call of the pack searcher.  They’ve ruined retail for the general public.  Thanks asshatsHot Packs – Pack searching brings me directly to the hot pack.  This is the fruits of the pack searcher.  I’ll never understand how someone can advertise a pack of cards as “guaranteed to contain a red parallel serial numbered out of 50.”  You are doing some serious pack negotiating if you’re seeing that in a pack.  If you can see all of that, don’t you think I know you can see if it’s Mike Trout or Chris Johnson?  Are you going to sell the Mike Trout in a hot pack or are you going to open that bad boy and sell the single?  Exactly.  Back to my stated odds section above, if you see someone advertise a hot pack that is guaranteed to contain an auto or mem, trust me, it’s not an auto!  I won’t even get started on the effects these searchers and hot packs have on the youth of our hobby.  Let’s just say it ain’t good!  I can’t keep talking about this or I’m going to lose it.


License Exclusivity – Let’s go back to some company issues.  This one is justbeyond my comprehension.  As most collectors are aware, Topps has the exclusive license to produce MLB trading cards.  Panini has the exclusive license to produce NFL trading cards.  I’ve said before, I’m a Donruss guy from back in the day.  I still love Donruss designs today.  But thanks to Topps and their MLB exclusivity, I only get Donruss cards with blank jerseys or bad photos that hide team names.  The 2017 design is one of my favorites ever from Donruss but it’s marred by the lack of being a licensed product.  I’m not just anti Topps on this either as you’ll see with my next peeve.  The fact that Panini has the exclusive license for football is just asinine.  What major sport should have trading cards without an option for Topps?  Nada.  Topps at least doesn’t plow through the NFL season with blank jersey’s and helmets but I do miss the company variety in football.  I loved Topps Museum, even though I rarely bought it by the box.  And Valor and Fire were cool designed products as well.  Who is this exclusivity helping besides the company itself?  Not the collector.  Not the open market.  Not the innovation of the hobby.  We’ve got to figure this out guys.  There is room for Topps, Donruss and Upper Deck in the major sports.  Give us a choice.100 Panini Products – Ok, when I say give us choice, this is not what I mean.  Again, I’m a Panini guy so this one pains me to write.  Panini released 40 basic card products in football this year.  You read that right, 40!  Origins, Prizm, Unparalled, Impeccable, Contenders, Classics, Draft Prizm, National Treasures, Spectra, Select, Rookies & Stars, Donruss, Prestige, Preferred, Playoff, Playbook…..see where this is headed?  I just named 16 – that’s not even half.  There are 52 weeks in a year and 20 weeks in a football season.  That’s almost a product a week during a calendar year and it’s 2 a week for a football season.  Good luck if you are an old school set collector.  You just have to pick a product or two and stick with it.  I can’t even keep up with the releases anymore.  This has to stop or it’s going to end very poorly for my favorite brand.  I don’t want to see that but it’s coming.  Spend more time on less products and you won’t have to charge $725 for a box of 8 cards.  With all those producers, how many stickers are floating around Panini with autographs at this point?

1990 Donruss – There’s really not much to say that hasn’t already been said about this abysmal set.  Same can be said for ’91 Fleer.  Although, for both products, I’d love to have been a fly on the wall when these designs were pitched to the execs.  Who signed off on these?  I’d really like to be privy to those conversations.Non-Drafted Autos – This is not intended for the “prospect” autos.  I am talking specifically about players who weren’t drafted, aren’t getting picked up and are on practice squads before the sets even come out.  There’s no point in advertising a box with 5 or 6 autos in it if 4 of the autos are Shane Drango, Nando De Colo, Levi Norwood and Jeremy Pargo.  You’re probably asking, “Who?”  To which I respond, “Exactly.”  Baseball is the least guilty of this travesty but they do like to throw in a ton of rookie relief pitchers in their autograph selection.  So that may as well be considered the equivalent of an offensive lineman or D League player.  Don’t beef up your autograph numbers with guys who wind up in the dime box.  Of course, some prospects hit and some never pan out but some are mediocre from the jump and the card companies know that as much as anybody.Fake Numbers on Rookies – This actually goes back to the Rookie Premier set that used to be produced.  That “fake number” is usually Double 0.  Some products still use it as Panini Origins from 2016 comes to mind.  I get that the companies bring these rookies in for photos, autos and whatnot, but that 00 is so generic.  Now, consider this – you pull a one color patch of a rookie from one of the many products from 2016.  If that patch is from these 00 jersey’s, what a ripoff that is!  I’d prefer the companies just use a picture from draft day or a photo not in the jersey altogether.  Do they not airbrush anymore?  I found out as I was wrapping this post up, my pal @sportcardcollec is not a fan either!Bad Autographs – Here’s one that’s on the player.   While I understand there are a lot of signings these days, the players have either gotten lazy or they’re not very creative with their signatures.  If it’s the result of too many signings, all this carpal tunnel syndrome is prompting players to shorten their signatures to something ridiculous.  One that comes to mind is Xavier Rhodes.  I have an autographed card that I pulled in a pack and it’s signed, “XR.”  Really?  I actually did get lucky and pull that auto but it’s “XR?”  If it’s lack of creativity, take some lessons from Taywon Taylor and jazz this thing up!  Players, your autograph is highly sought after.  Take the time to make it look good!  At least make it reasonably legible.One Color Patches – My biggest issue with these is that I have zero faith that this clothing I’m looking at is a piece of actual jersey.  I’ll take your word for it with your guarantees but a one color patch is the equivalent of the initials autograph.  See my above on fake numbers and you see the issue.Taping Toploaders – Here’s one for the shippers.  I’ve brought it up before but it bears repeating.  When you tape a toploader, you essentially take away from its future usage.  It’s always going to have that sticky film on it and it’s effectively useless unless I’ve got some dupes that aren’t for viewing any more.  Please don’t tape your toploaders shut when mailing products.  Shipping is something that often gets too little attention but it’s something to leaves an impression with your buyer.  I prefer to wrap my cards in paper or put them in the clear bags to avoid tape on the holders.Redemption Substitutions – Back to the companies.  Redemptions alone are pretty frustrating.  First, it means that I’ve got to wait from the card that I actually bought today.  One of my astute tweeps, @gatorpk321 had a good take on this a few weeks  ago.  The card companies don’t take an I.O.U. from us when we buy so why are we taking them from us when we rip the packs?  But even worse than the redemption is the redemption substitution. Sometimes these I.O.U.’s don’t materialize in the form of the actual card we’re promised.  The company then makes their own determination of “similar value”.  I’ve stated before, collecting for me is not as tied to dollar value as much as interest.  I pulled a 2013 Topps Archives William “Refrigerator” Perry auto a couple of years ago.  Being an 80’s-90’s guy, I was ecstatic!    After a looong wait, I finally got a letter in the mail from Topps with a Jarvis Landry auto and a “bonus” Joe Adams auto.  Wait, what??  First, Joe Adams is not even in the league!  Any other time, Jarvis Landry would be a welcome addition but in the place of The Fridge?  I can’t even describe the letdown.

Well, that’s my initial list but I know there are others.  I’m already planning a part 2 But I need your help.  Tell me what your pet peeve is and if we have it in common, I’ll add it to the list for Part 2.  The hobby is a wonderful pastime but there are certain aspects that make me scratch my head and wonder what’s going on.  We can have fun with it in a post like this but I know it really gets under everyone’s skin and drives us mad.  So, what’s your pet peeve??

J-Dub

A Hobby of Passion

I have written a lot about what my collecting style is like over the last couple of months.  I do love the “junk wax” years for nostalgic purposes.  I could sit and open boxes from the late 80’s all day long and be as happy as a fat kid in a candy store.  I do get happy in the candy store too so take that however you’d like.  That doesn’t mean I don’t buy new products, because I do.  I just find myself focusing more on the “hits” when I buy new product.   I can really stop and smell the bubble gum scented roses with a box of ’89 Topps, if you know what I mean.Card collecting is something that can be driven by various factors.   Some people want to make money, some people want to keep memories of their youth alive, some people like the challenge of building sets or collecting specific players and some people just have compulsions that they can’t conquer.   I fall somewhere between youthful memories and set/player collecting but I haven’t always been there.  I was once in the “making money” portion of the hobby, as most of us were at some point.  After all, that’s what created the boom and crash of the Junk Wax Era.  Everybody wanted in and everybody wanted to make a buck.I will be honest with you, I’ve never increased my net cash flow because of card collecting.  Sure, I have sold some cards but I always pump it right back into another box or PC singles so “profit margin” would likely be considered negative.  I also realized that the time period I spent trying to pull those monsters was also the least fun I had in the hobby.  It left me wanting more and more and never really feeling satisfied.  If I didn’t pull that big hit, I’d think it was surely in the next box so I’d run out and buy another high priced box.  If I did pull a big hit, I’d feel like I had a little streak of good luck so I’d go out and buy another high priced box.  See the problem here?Don’t misinterpret what I’m saying here.  There’s nothing wrong with being a monster chaser.  It’s just not for me.  Now I’ll splurge every now and again and even hopped in a couple of box breaks last week with Top Shelf Breaks and had some good luck.  I’ll go back to the box break from time to time as well when the product and price are right.  When I do, be assured that it will be TSB that I go to.  But I’ve sort of found my happy place.  Maybe it’s part of hitting the big 4-0 this year and having a different perspective.  Maybe it’s my bank account screaming at me to change my ways.  Or maybe it’s the Ghost of Collector’s Past showing me how happy I was when I studied the cards and the players as opposed to shuffling past base cards to find a relic or auto and basing the success of the pack solely on that search.  I don’t know how it happened but in the words of the great Kin Kinsley, I Feel Like A Collector Again!I remember sitting in my bedroom as a kid, reading the back of every card and memorizing stats.  In 2012, I couldn’t tell you what the back of a Topps card looked like because that’s not where the autographs were.  I missed out on some fun during those days.  As I’ve said before, Every Card Has A Story, and I missed some good stories while I was daydreaming of my appearance on Pawn Stars.  If there had been autographs in 1989, I wouldn’t have my Orel Hershiser All-Star story.  If 1991 had 1 of 1’s, I wouldn’t get so excited to pull a card that glows under a black light.  I’ve decided that I need goals to reach and I need players to seek and I need 80’s sets to complete.  That’s my happy place.  That’s where I feel most at home.Along those lines, I’ve gotten a fair share of Twitter DM’s asking me why I PC Ron Gant.  Well, it’s really sort of a simple explanation.  I’m a lifelong Braves fan.  My parents have photographs of me in the stands with Bruce Benedict warming up in the on-deck circle behind me.  I remember watching Gerald Perry and Dion James and Claudell Washington play long before Chipper Jones and Freddie Freeman.  Skip, Ernie and Pete were my announcers growing up.  We were bad.  We were real bad.  Dale Murphy was the only superstar we had for many years.  Well, when I started collecting in 1989, I started watching the game closer.  I started collecting about the same time that my favorite team called up the 1986 Atlanta Braves Minor League Player of the Year. In 1990, we were still bad but I was 13 and playing little league ball had me starting to emulate the ball players I admired.  Also in 1990, Ron Gant joined the 30/30 club.  He did it again in 1991, becoming the first MLB player to do so in back to back seasons.  At 13-14, looking at Ron Gant was like looking at superman.  He was chiseled.  He was strong and fast.  He was the ball player I wanted to be.  The timing was right for Gant to be my favorite ball player.  My age, my interest in collecting, his status with the Braves and his 1989 Donruss card just brought it all together like a perfect storm.I’ve remained a Gant fan since 1989.  I basically mourned when he had his accident and parted ways with the Braves.  I still followed him with the Red and Cards and others and always pulled for him.  I was thrilled when he came back to work at Fox Sports a few years back.  I even finally got to meet him at a game and my wife said I almost knocked him over slapping him on the back.  I seriously doubt that because Gant is built like a small tank but I can imagine that I was a little over excited in the moment.  I just don’t remember that part of it.  So I decided around that time that I was going to try and collect every Ron Gant card that was produced.  I had around 80 of them so I though I was off to a good start.  Then I looked him up on The Trading Card Database and discovered that he had 868 cards.  I realized that I had a lot of work to do.  Monster Chaser Dub would’ve said “no way” to a challenge like that.  But Collector Dub accepted the challenge and has been dedicated to it ever since.  I wore the man’s number in sports for 25 years, the least I can do is try to complete the collection.So that’s why I PC Ron Gant.  And this post is why I love to open Junk Wax.  I once read, “You find out who you are by figuring out who and what you’re not.”  The same can be applied to collecting.  I’ve tried lots of collecting styles and that is how I’ve figured out what does and doesn’t work for me.  Some things I learned the hard way.  Some things just weren’t fun.  But for whatever reason, I’m here.  I’m buying $6 mid-80’s oddball sets.  I’m ripping boxes of 1989 and 1991 Topps.  I’m grabbing every Ron Gant card that finds its way into my sight line.  I even received my latest wax box, 1991 Fleer, in the mail today.  I’m not always proud of my mail days but I’m going to love going through that box and looking at those old Pro-Visions once again.  And that’s me.  That’s what I’m most passionate about in the hobby.  That’s what floats my boat.  What floats yours?

J-Dub

Mail Day from Sport Card Collectors

I picked up a nice mail day from Sport Card Collectors today.  I’ll start by saying that he’s a wonderful follow on Twitter and he can be found @SportCardCollec.  He also authors a blog about card collecting and it’s found at http://sportcardcollectors.blogspot.com.  Correction, he has two blogs now with his New York Giants PC blog and it’s found at http://snaggingcardboard.blogspot.com.  Check him out at his various locations!

I posted a group of football cards that I was trying to move and he spotted the 2016 Panini Origins Sterling Shepard and wanted it for his pc.  We began our discussion and I found out that he had just pulled a pretty sweet Rediscover Topps card for my PC.  We were able to swing a deal and my side came in today.  It was a fine example of a good trade.  We both were able to get what we needed and our PC’s are better off for it.The first card for my side of the deal was the one that caught my eye immediately.  Others may see a standard 1987 Rediscover Topps card but I see a player that would eventually lead to one of the cornerstone’s of the 90’s Atlanta Braves National League dominance.  That player was Doyle Alexander.  In 1987, the Detroit Tigers were in a heated pennant race and needed a veteran arm.  Enter Doyle Alexander.  Alexander began his career in 1971 and was a cagey veteran by 1987.  He wasn’t spectacular but was something that Detroit felt they needed.  In return, the Braves received John Smoltz, only two years out of high school.  The Tigers would go on to win the AL East but later would lose in the playoffs to Minnesota.  Alexander went 9-0 for the Tigers after the trade so it appeared to payoff for the short term.  He would go on to pitch 2 more seasons with Detroit before retiring.  John Smoltz on the other hand, was just getting started.  He would end up having a hall of fame career playing for the Braves.  He would win 213 games for Atlanta and save another 154 becoming baseball’s first 200/150 man.  He was also a vital part of the best pitching staff in baseball during the 90’s.  And Braves fans have veteran Doyle Alexander for a big part of that.  So, hats off to you Doyle and your last card in a Braves uni.Another lynchpin for the Braves over most of the 90’s and 2000’s was Chipper Jones.  This sweet Topps Heritage Clubhouse Collection Chipper patch caught my eye as well.  There are 2 additional Jones’ that were a part of the deal from the 2006 Panini USA set.  Great cards to add to my pc.Next, we have the current star of the Braves, Freddie Freeman.  2016 was his best year as a pro as he hit 34 home runs with a .302 average.  He’s going to be needed over the next couple of years as our rebuild continues.  I love these Bowmans Best cards.The next player is Tom Glavine on a 1990 Topps.  This is the first set I owned as a full set.  The design was classic 90’s and there was neon everywhere but it was still my first set.  Glavine was one of the aces with Smoltz in the 90’s and 2000’s and another member of the staff that got his HOF credentials.  Nice add!The last Brave is Adonis Garcia.  The jury is still out on Garcia but he does have some pop in his bat.  He’s averaged .275 and hit 24 home runs over the last 2 seasons, which was actually about a seasons worth of games.  Defense is a little shaky but we need pop.The final was a surprise pack of Elvis cards!  This will actually help me score bonus points with the mother in law.  She loved Elvis and collects records and trinkets but I don’t think she has any trading cards.  Win/Win!Very nice mailday package from Sport Card Collectors today.  In addition, and this is not to be overshadowed, I had a very nice Ron Gant Mail Day from @BuriednCarolina.  I understand that he inherited a bunch of late 80’s-early 90’s cards and he’s moving them in player or team sets.  Check him out if this is your card era.  He has some nice deals and shipping was fast and well packaged.  Until the next Mail Day, check out some of my other recent posts, the reviews of 1989 Topps and 1985 Drakes cards.  Happy Collecting!

J-Dub

Drakes Bakes Up A Sweet 1985 Set

Up until a couple of weeks ago, the only thing I knew about Drakes was that Newman loved their coffee cakes on Seinfeld. I assumed they were a baking company and never had any other reason to check them out. Then the discussion on oddball sets happened. Ryan (@basecardhero), Scott (@SBergerBOSTON), Shane (@ShaneKatz73) Donnie (@TheDingoDad) and others started a big discussion that in, Ryan’s terms, “Escalated Quickly.” What we all thought were just random oddball sets turned into a massive list of retail sets that were available from the 80’s that we didn’t even know about. Some of them were regional and we would have had no real reason to know about them. Drakes must have been one of those sets, because I had no idea, but you can believe I ran out and bought me a set for my collection.The set I bought was 1985 but the box shows that it’s the 5th annual edition. A little more research revealed that they produced sets from 1981-1988. The sets were labeled “Big Hitters plus Super Pitchers”; reminiscent to the set I reviewed that started this cluster of a conversation, Fleer’s 1987 “Sluggers vs Pitchers.” The set had a total of 44 cards (no stickers though) and was broken into 33 hitters and 11 pitchers. The checklist is phenomenal in my opinion. There isn’t one player that I think is out of place in the set. One of the reasons I think that may be because Jack Clark was excluded. Another plus is that the cards are from 1985. You can’t buy cards from 1985 as cheaply as you can buy cards from 1989 but this vintage set only cost me $6.49 with free shipping!The cards themselves were set to mirror the ’85 flagship Topps product but have the added Drakes logo and a different bottom banner. The backs of the cards are almost identical with the exception of the color. The ’85 Topps cards were green with red writing and Drakes is red with dark blue writing. They are very similar in style and the card stock is the same as well. The cards were in remarkable condition to be 32 years old, though they had a distinct odor to them. The fronts of the cards had the “5th Annual Collector’s Edition” logo at the top, either in green (National League) or red (American League) and included the card number in the series. At the bottom, there was a Drakes “Big Hitter” or “Super Pitcher” logo next to the banner with the players name, team and position. All of the hitter’s photographs were taken during a swing at the plate. The pitchers were all taken on the mound, most mid delivery. Again, the backs were typical Topps with background info, stats and the occasional trivia question.The Hitters

This checklist is loaded with sluggers from 1985. Listen to some of these stats; Tony Armas (43 bombs), Harold Baines (29/.304), Dwight Evans (32/.295), Tony Gwynn (.351), Don Mattingly (.343), Dale Murphy (36/.290), Eddie Murray (29/.306), Cal Ripken (27/.304), Mike Schmidt (6 consecutive 30+ HR seasons). Again, I have no beef with the selections in this set. I obviously have a personal beef with the inclusion of Kent Hrbek but I’m not going down that road again. His stats were worthy of inclusion so we’ll just leave it at that.The Pitchers

There were only 11 pitchers included but they were all generally stat stuffers and several were future Hall of Famers. Steve Carlton had 313 wins by the time 1985 rolled around, along with a career 3.04 ERA. Doc Gooden was just getting started but his rookie year was 17-9 with a 2.60 ERA and 276 K’s in 218 IP. Tom Seaver was knocking on the door of 300 wins with 288 by 1985. He also had a career sub 3.00 ERA (2.80) with 3,403 K’s. Finally, future Brave, Bruce Sutter was included, wearing his St. Louis Cardinals uniform but his card had the tag at the bottom that said “Now with Braves”. There were a couple of oddball pitchers but nothing too far out there.

The Uniforms

The absolute best part of the set was the uniforms that the players were shown in. Take a look at these gems.Gary Carter – Montreal ExposAlvin Davis – Seattle MarinersSteve Garvey – San Diego PadresTony Gwynn – San Diego PadresKent Turdbek – Minnesota TwinsMike Schmidt – Philadelphia PhilliesTom Seaver – Chicago White Sox

I’ll tell you that this may be the best oddball set I own now. It’s the oldest and the cards are in really good condition. You will not even find many packs from 1985 for this cost and I would put the quality of these cards up against the flagship set. It makes me want to check out the other Drakes sets but I am also worried that I may be disappointed in the next set. I don’t want to be let down after this pleasant surprise! I have to give these a Dub Score of 5 for several reasons. First, the reasonable cost is unbeatable. It’s always a plus to add a set that’s 30+ years old to your collection so vintage value is a winner. The checklist is strong, as mentioned above. Finally, the quality is really good for a set of 1985 baseball cards. I’m actually going to order another so I can random this one to someone else who can enjoy them as well! Collect and keep this hobby strong my friends!

Dub Score – 5

Scoring Scale

1. Let me be the sacrificial lamb so you don’t have to buy these cards.  Just read the post and thank me later.
2. There is worse but there is much better – not worth the effort though.

3. Middle of the road – I wouldn’t talk you into buying these but I certainly wouldn’t talk you out of them.

4. You should probably go out and buy a box and enjoy the rip – I did!  It has some downside but worth the ride.

5. Stop reading and find a box to buy and get to Breaking!  What are you waiting on?

1989 Topps – The Hunt for Gregg Jefferies

I started full blown card collecting in 1989.  I was 12 years old and cards and video games were what life was about for me.  The sets that were readily available to me were Topps and Donruss in my hometown.  Every now and then, a box of Fleer would sneak in but I never saw Upper Deck.  I had the chance to grab some UD on a church trip once to a bigger city but Camilla stuck with the basics.  That said, cards were much more widely available then than now.  I could get them at Rite Aid, Big B Drugs, Wal Mart and Piggly Wiggly, along with a few convenience stores.  Now, Wal Mart remains the lone carrier of cards in my hometown and their selection is pitiful.  I went home this past weekend and Wal Mart was stocked full of Magic cards but they had 4 jumbo retail packs of Topps, one football blaster of Optic and one 2017 Heritage blaster.  I took the Heritage blaster and posted those hits Friday night.Back to 1989, Topps was abundant in town so I remember going through a couple of boxes of these during that year.  That was not whole boxes at once but definitely by the pack over the course of the summer.  I don’t know that I’ve opened a pack of ’89 Topps since then, until now.  I really love the design for that year and it’s really the last year Topps had that old school feel to it to me.  1990 brought a definite 90’s design that still remains a popular one with me but is a bit on the extreme side.  I like the ’91 design and it was more of a classic look than ’ 90 but was not ’89.  Of course, the Future Star was a fine subset of ’89 that I have spoken of before, here.  It also held one of the most magical cards of my childhood but more on that later.  I don’t remember them being .45 cents per pack back then but I wasn’t the one doing the buying in those days either.  But looking back,  I don’t understand why I got so much grief for asking for baseball cards when we went to the store.I have a lot of memories of 1989 and collecting cards.  Some good and some not so good.  I may have even already told this one but I remember 1989 Topps getting me in hot water with my dad one time.  We were on our way to the lake for the weekend and we stopped at a grocery store.  Of course, I found the card section and talked him into making a small purchase.  However, I did something else that ticked him off and resulted in him buying the cards but telling me I couldn’t open them until the next day as punishment.  Being the sneaky kid that I was, I pried open the back of one of the wax packs just to take a glimpse.  The only thing I saw was an Orel Hershiser All-Star card.  I was satisfied that my pack was going to be ok and I went back to quietly riding in the car.  Well, dad eventually saw the creased open wax pack and I had them taken from me for a week.  That was a rough one at the time.  Little did I know, a .05 cent card would be my undoing.  Spoiler alert – I did pull it tonight!As I said above, the card is a very classic design with the white border, rounded in the top left and bottom right corners where the Topps logo and name banner are.  My favorite part of the design is the bubble letters used to show the team name in the bottom right corner.  The bubble letters are one of the team colors and it swoops around to provide a spot for the player’s name to be spelled out in a classic wavy banner.  The back of the card had a black border with a pinkish/red background.  Other than the color, it was typical Topps of the previous years with a full career of stats and informational tidbits, unless the career took up the whole back.  The box itself holds 36 packs with 15 cards per pack.  So a total of 540 cards but the set itself was 792 cards in more typical set fashion for the late 80’s.  The wax pack was a great looking blue color that remains my favorite Topps wax pack of my generation.  And of course, gum – lots and lots of dextrose and corn syrup.So with the outline of the set for you, let’s take a look at the vintage gems I uncovered in these packs.  Vintage is technically classified as 25+ years old, right?Base Cards – The set is loaded with stars from the good ole days of Baseball.  The checklist includes Nolan Ryan, Cal Ripken Jr., Jose Canseco, Wade Boggs, Doc Gooden, Daryl Strawberry, Kirby Puckett and others.  The card I chose for this piece is Mike Greenwell.  I had a discussion last week with @scottberger on Twitter about how Bostonians felt about Greenwell as I had always considered him vastly underrated.  It seems that Boston agreed with me, as evidenced by the homemade sign that Scott made pushing for Greenwell to get the All-Star vote ahead of Jose Canseco.  Greenwell approved too and signed that bed sheet for Scott.  So consider me an even bigger fan.  Plus, on the field, he hit over .300 for the first four years of his career (up to the ’89 Topps) with years of .323, .314, .328 and .325.  In ’88, he hit .325 with 22 bombs, 119 RBI and 16 SB.  Damn solid!All-Stars – The set also included cards from the National and American League All-Star participants.  These were colorful cards with either a red (American) or blue (National) background with the same bubble letter font used for the “All-Star” logo.Topps All-Star Rookies – Another Topps tradition was naming All-Star Rookies in their sets.  The beauty I’ve posted here is Chris Sabo from the 90’s Big Red Machine.  Sabo was a very good third baseman known for his signature goggles!  Also a beast on RBI 3.Future Stars – Here is where the big money card was in 1989, Gregg Jefferies.  As Ryan (@basecardhero) so aptly reminded me as I was posting cards last night, this card was supposed to be one of those “retirement cards” by now.  Jefferies was a hot rookie for the NY Mets and I think I owned (still own) all of his ’89 cards.  My favorite was the Topps version because of the Future Star logo.  Alas, I did not pull a Jefferies but you have a chance to in the random that’s outlined below.  I did pull the second (maybe third) best option with Sandy Alomar Jr.  The other great option in the set was Gary Sheffield.  I also pulled ’89 rookie Mike Harkey.Draft Picks – I did pull some good draft picks in this box.  I pulled the best one, Robin Ventura, and also Braves phenom, Steve Avery.  There were several other pulls but none that really stuck over the years.  This Ventura was one of my favorites in ’89 as it was taken in his college uniform.Managers – Oh yes, in fine Topps fashion, the manager card was ever present.  There were some legendary managers in ’89, like the pictured Don Zimmer and Tommy Lasorda.  There were also some duds that shall remain nameless.Record Breakers – The first few cards in the set were Record Breaker cards that commemorated some big statistical performances.  The card pictured is George Bell and it outlines his 3 home runs on opening day in 1988, which was a major league record.  Others included Wade Boggs consecutive 200 hit seasons (6 – attributed to an all chicken diet), Andre Dawson and more.Team Leaders – In lieu of a team photo card, the team leaders was a semi-checklist card with a star pictured on the front, in this case Bo Jackson of the Royals.  The back of the card listed the team leaders in the major statistical categories.Turn Back The Clock – The final insert in the set was a small collection of Turn Back the Clock cards featuring stars of yesterday (as in before ’89) and featured a Topps card of a star from the early years.  The card featured here is of Lou Brock and is from 10 years prior to ’89.  It covered major events of the ’79 season on the back of the card.  I also pulled Hank Aaron (15 years ago), Gil Hodges (25 years ago) and Tony Oliva (25 years ago).All in all, a great trip down memory lane even though the Jefferies card eluded me.  This was a set that was very important in cultivating my collecting efforts as a 12 year old beginner.  Another fine example of value being in the mind of the collector.  I won’t be putting these cards up on eBay and making any money but the evening spent thumbing through cards from my youth is priceless but I will be buying another box to try and finish up the set.  The cost of the box is very reasonable and I really did not pull a ton of duplicates so the collation was pretty good.  The gum stains are a drawback for anyone looking for mint cards.  It also left Ken Griffey Jr. for the Traded Set.  This is still one of my favorite Topps sets, for design and sentimental reasons.  Because of these reasons, I will give it a Dub Score of 4.  I think you’ll like the walk down memory lane if you bought these in ’89 and buy another box today.As for the random I mentioned, this has the potential to net you 2 of the best cards from the ’89 set.  I saved the last 4 packs to random off to one winner who follows the instructions below.  I did not pull a Gregg Jefferies or Gary Sheffield so the odds are that one of them is in these final 4 packs.  Who knows, maybe both of them are there.  All you have to do to win these 4 packs is retweet this blog post (which is the pinned post on Twitter) and respond to the post with the year you started collecting cards.  It’s that simple.  Thanks for checking it out!

Dub Score – 4

Scoring Scale

  1. Let me be the sacrificial lamb so you don’t have to buy these cards.  Just read the post and thank me later.
  2. There is worse but there is much better – not worth the effort though.
  3. Middle of the road – I wouldn’t talk you into buying these but I certainly wouldn’t talk you out of them.
  4. You should probably go out and buy a box and enjoy the rip – I did!  It has some downside but worth the ride.
  5. Stop reading and find a box to buy and get to Breaking!  What are you waiting on?